BEYOND REGULATION: INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY BUILDING ANDTHE QUALITY OF PhD PROGRAMMES IN KAZAKHSTAN

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59787/2413-5488-2026-55-3-39-48

Keywords:

PhD programmes, institutional quality, doctoral education, higher education governance, supervision, Kazakhstan.

Abstract

This article examines the relationship between the quality of PhD programmes and the institutional maturity of universities in Kazakhstan. Drawing on official national data for 2021–2024 and on international frameworks in doctoral education and research supervision, the study analyses doctoral admissions, dissertation defences, completion patterns, and the institutional conditions shaping programme quality. The findings reveal a widening gap between the expansion of PhD programmes and the institutional capacity required to sustain effective supervision, research environments, and ethical governance. The article argues that doctoral quality depends less on regulation alone than on universities’ managerial and organisational ability to embed doctoral training within active research ecosystems. It concludes that the sustainable development of PhD programmes in Kazakhstan requires stronger institutional concentration, structured support for supervisors, more systematic progress monitoring, and fuller integration of research ethics into internal quality assurance.

Author Biographies

  • Aida Sagintayeva, Nazarbayev University

    PhD, Vice Provost for Academic Planning and Budget, Dean of the Graduate School of Education, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Republic of Kazakhstan, asagintayeva@nu.edu.kz, ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6249-0840 (corresponding author)

  • Gulmira Qanay, Nazarbayev University

    PhD, Graduate School of Education, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Republic of Kazakhstan, gkanayeva@nu.edu.kz, ORCID: 0000-0003-4935-6027

References

Abdi, S., Pizzolato, D., Nemery, B., & Dierickx, K. (2021). Educating PhD students in research integrity in Europe. Science and Engineering Ethics, 27, Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00290-0

Bayanbayeva, A. (2026). The impact of the ‘publish or perish’ culture on research practices and academic life in Kazakhstan: Challenges and consequences in the age of global university rankings. Higher Education Research & Development, 45(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2025.2526051

EUA Council for Doctoral Education. (2016). Doctoral education: Taking Salzburg forward – Implementation and new challenges. European University Association.

Guarimata-Salinas, G., Carvajal, J. J., & Jiménez López, M. D. (2024). Redefining the role of doctoral supervisors: A multicultural examination of labels and functions in contemporary doctoral education. Higher Education, 88, 1305–1330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01171-0

Halse, C., & Malfroy, J. (2010). Retheorizing doctoral supervision as professional work. Studies in Higher Education, 35(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070902906798

Ibraev, A. Zh., Kul’evskaya, Y. G., Ulez’ko, G. G., & Galants, E. A. (2015). Reforming the system of research-staff training: Doctoral (Ph.D.) education in Kazakhstan. Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 42, 78–84. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688215020082

Kuzhabekova, A. (2020). Development and transformation of doctoral education in Kazakhstan. In M. Yudkevich, P. G. Altbach, & H. de Wit (Eds.), Trends and issues in doctoral education: A global perspective (pp. 340–362). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9789353885991.n14

Kuzhabekova, A. (2025). Ph.D. publication requirement and its effects on research productivity trends in Kazakhstan. Higher Education Quarterly, 79(1), Article e12590. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12590

Lee, A. (2008). How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802049202

McAlpine, L. (2013). Doctoral supervision: Not an individual but a collective institutional responsibility. Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 36(3), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1174/021037013807533061

McAlpine, L., & Norton, J. (2006). Reframing our approach to doctoral programs: An integrative framework for action and research. Higher Education Research & Development, 25(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360500453012

National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan under the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2025). Report of the National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan under the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan on Science for 2024. Almaty. ISBN 9965-25-129-0.

Rönkkönen, S., Tikkanen, L., Virtanen, V., & Pyhältö, K. (2024). The impact of supervisor and research community support on PhD candidates’ research engagement. European Journal of Higher Education, 14(4), 536–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2023.2229565

Ruziev, K., Rabbimova, D., & Mamasolieva, M. (2026). Reforming doctoral education in Uzbekistan: Models, rules and norms of behaviour. Higher Education Policy, 39, 500–526. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-025-00396-1

Satpayeva, Z., Kangalakova, D., Kakizhanova, T., & Konstantinova, K. (2025). Challenges of Ph.D. training in social sciences and humanities in Kazakhstani universities. Knowledge and Performance Management, 9(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.21511/kpm.09(1).2025.01

Shamatov, D., Ispambetova, B., Baikenov, K., & Kuzhabekova, A. (2026). Research integrity under publication requirements: A qualitative study of doctoral education in Kazakhstan. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 22, Article 9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-026-00219-9

Skopek, J., Triventi, M., & Blossfeld, H.-P. (2022). How do institutional factors shape PhD completion rates? An analysis of long-term changes in a European doctoral program. Studies in Higher Education, 47(2), 318–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1744125

Taylor, S. (2023). The changing landscape of doctoral education: A framework for analysis and introduction to the special issue. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 60(5), 606–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2237962

Tokatligil, Y., Saliyeva, A., Mambetalina, A., Nurmanbetova, J., & Karmelyuk, A. (2025). Co-supervision in Kazakhstan PhD programs: The Kazakhstani + international co-supervisor model. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 20, Article 15. https://doi.org/10.28945/5626

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

Issue

Section

ISSUES OF QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION